A week of not correcting anybody
Try one week of not correcting anybody. With the North Node in Pisces in the 3rd house, ordinary conversation is supposed to carry more than accuracy: what somebody meant, how they are, what they were not able to say. You need one exchange where being right was not the point.
Your attention in conversation goes to what is imprecise, and the correction arrives before you have decided to make it. Most of what people bring you is not a claim; it is a person.
Letting the error stand is genuinely uncomfortable
An inaccuracy in somebody's account produces a physical urge to fix it, and holding that urge for thirty seconds is harder than it sounds. Do it once a day, deliberately, and time how long the urge lasts. The conversation goes somewhere different, and you will usually find the inaccuracy was not the subject anybody was actually discussing.
Answering with the correct information
The retreat is precision: somebody tells you something and you respond to the part that was wrong, or unclear, or missing a detail. It is helpful and it ends the exchange. Watch for it, and reply to what they meant instead, once per conversation. Accuracy can be supplied later if anybody wants it.
Ask how it was, not what happened
Start by changing the question: rather than establishing the facts of somebody's week, ask what it was like. Then stay with the answer without organising it into anything. The exercise is receiving something unstructured, which your usual mode converts into a summary before it has finished arriving. One conversation a day is enough.
The people who stopped telling you things
Somebody near you edits what they say to you because it will be examined, and the editing has become so habitual that neither of you notices it happening. Ask one person whether that is true, plainly. The answer usually arrives quickly and is more specific than you expected, and the situation improves within weeks.
Let the conversation go nowhere
Your exchanges tend to have a purpose: information transferred, a matter settled, something achieved by the end. Spend one conversation with no objective whatsoever and no attempt to steer it. It will feel like time being wasted for about ten minutes and then it becomes the thing people actually mean by good company.
Not everything needs a correction
In working conversation you supply the missing detail, the caveat and the more accurate version, all of which is useful and all of which costs a small amount of goodwill each time. Let three inaccuracies pass this week that do not materially matter. What you buy with that is people bringing you things earlier.
Listen to the same story again
Relatives repeat themselves and your response has been to note the repetition rather than to receive the telling. The story is rarely the point; the telling is. Hear one familiar account all the way through as though it were new. That is a form of love this arena recognises and precision does not supply.
Say how it is, not what it measures
When you describe how you are, you give data: hours slept, things noted, what the numbers say this week. Try the other version once with somebody — how it actually feels, without translating it into anything. Language that is imprecise about the body is more useful than you think, and you have been declining to use it.
Hear the feeling under the complaint
When a partner raises something, you address the content: whether it is accurate, what actually happened, where the reasoning fails. All of that is beside the point they were making. Respond to the state they are actually in rather than to the case they happened to make, once, and then watch how quickly the whole conversation resolves itself.