Able to argue both, needing to know which
Two things hold at once here. You can construct the strongest version of either side of an argument, and you genuinely need to know which one is true. Pluto in Libra in the 9th house puts the search for balance into belief itself.
Read the Libra half as the water everybody in your birth years was swimming in, since Pluto crosses a sign over decades and colours the whole span the same way. Your own address in it is the 9th house, decided by your birth time. It is why the fairness question is aimed at ideas and at what other cultures do, rather than at your partnerships: you cannot hold a view without first hearing the case against it.
What you learned before you had a view
Somewhere early there were two accounts of the world in the same room and you had to be able to move between them without offending either. It was a survival skill and it was thorough. That is why you can enter any position from the inside, and why declaring for one of them still feels like a betrayal of somebody who is not present.
The point where it stops
You will not conclude. There is always another perspective not yet consulted, and consulting it is genuinely rigorous and also a way of never being answerable. From outside it reads as having no convictions at all. Take one position publicly this year, before you feel ready, and let the correction happen in the open rather than in your head.
What people meet in a serious conversation
They meet somebody who states their own case back to them better than they did, which is disarming, and then declines to say what they themselves think. Some find that generous and others find it evasive. Both readings are fair. Offer your own position early, even provisionally, since without it the exchange is a service rather than a conversation.
A view you are willing to be wrong about
What you are missing is not analysis, which you have in quantity, but the experience of having been publicly mistaken and finding that it was survivable. That is the whole exercise. Declare something, be wrong about it in front of people, and notice that your standing does not collapse, since only that evidence will move this.
You keep waiting for the last argument
There is a decision or a belief you have been deferring on the grounds that you have not heard everything yet, and you have been deferring it for years. The information you are waiting for is not going to arrive in a form that settles it. Choose on the evidence you have, now, and treat the residual doubt as permanent rather than as a reason.
You are given the case nobody can settle
When two parties are entrenched, you are the one asked to work out what the actual disagreement is, and you can usually name it in a sentence neither of them would have produced. That is specialist work with a general reputation attached. Describe what it prevents rather than what it involves, since prevention is the only version of this that appears on a budget.
You are close to people who avoid each other
Two people you value would find each other intolerable, and you keep both relationships intact by staying carefully undeclared with each. It is a real skill and it means you are never wholly present in either. Say one contentious thing in front of one of them this year and let the friendship take the weight, since it has never once been tested.
You adopt their view of the world
Within a year of a serious relationship you can no longer separate what you think from what the two of you think, and the merging happens without any decision being made. It is not weakness, it is how your judgement forms in the first place. Write down three of your positions before the next relationship starts shaping them, so that a record exists to compare against later.
The unresolved question keeps you awake
An open matter with no conclusion available runs in you at low volume for months and shows up as broken sleep and a tight lower back rather than as visible worry. Deciding badly settles the body faster than deciding correctly at some point in the future. Close one open question this month on imperfect information, and observe what the closing does physically.